|
|

|
Brit at 3.5 years old
|
When Brit was first born her large tongue was already evident. She stuck out her tongue quite a lot right from the start, yet our efforts to get an explanation for this were met with sarcasm and derision by the NICU staff. Over time, the disproportion of the tongue became worse. Eventually she was no longer able to keep her tongue in her mouth at all, except for quite rare moments of 3-4 seconds at most, nor was she able to keep a pacifier in her mouth without our assistance. Now she has begun to 'practice', so to speak, with keeping her tongue in her mouth - we think this might have something to do with the irritation caused by her new baby teeth. After she was released home, problems with feeding began. After trying out endless bottle nipples and being near tears ourselves at each feeding, we finally found a nipple that worked well for her (Pur) – and she was able to maintain an average growth of ~250gr/week until the growth curve naturally began to decline as she got older. All we can say is that nipples such as those which use more holes (those which are based on creating a vacuum) rather than bigger holes to increase the flow are not appropriate for babies who use their upper lip together with their tongue to suck. Brit was completely unable to get the suction right with those nipples. Just a standard nipple with one hole (we found that the medium sized hole worked well for her right from the start) is the only way to go. Nevertheless mealtimes take quite a long time for Brit. In the beginning it would take her an 1 1/2 hours to finish her bottle - and it would tire her out completely. Now things are much better and mealtimes are more relaxed if still requiring lots of time.
In August 1999, Brit underwent
extensive testing in order to determine why exactly she had such a large
tongue and what could/should be done about it. The tests were conducted
at Schneider Children's Hospital and included:
The tests ruled out every other
possible cause for her macroglossia, so the two explanations which remain
(and that the medical staff is divided about) are:
The corrective treatment recommended to us was tongue reduction surgery.
There seems to be a lot of difference in opinion within the medical community
as to when is most beneficial to do such a surgery. Therefore the decision
as to when the surgery would take place was a difficult one for us to make.
We wanted to balance Brit's maturity and ability to undergo and recuperate
from the surgery with the desire to prevent as much as possible any adverse
effects her large tongue will have on speech development and orthodontic
development. We thought the best time would be approximately one year of
age and we did find highly recommended doctors who agreed with us. In looking
for a surgeon, it was important to us to find someone who had ample experience
and a proven track record with this specific type of surgery on very young
children. Due to the fact that BWS is so extremely rare, in Israel there
is not sufficient experience with this type of surgery and so we began
searching for a surgeon abroad. It seemed that the bulk of the experienced
surgeons for tongue reduction surgery were in North America. We finally
decided to go with
Dr Jeffrey
Marsh at
St Louis Children's
Hospital in Missouri . We feel very confident with Dr Marsh and are
really happy with his 'human' approach - as well as the more important
fact that his record in this specific surgery is outstanding, with no trachs
ever required post-op to date (except, of course, those kids who came in
with a trach). Another critical aspect of our decision making process was
that no child on whom Dr Marsh has done a tongue reduction has ever had
to return to have a second surgery - although he has done second reductions
on children who were originally operated on by other surgeons. Brit's
surgery will take place May 17th of 2000 when she will be a year and 2
months old (or 11 months old adjusted age for prematurity).
In the meantime, Brit is developing just fine and is otherwise a happy, healthy baby. Due to her eating problems, she was such a fussy baby in the beginning. We nicknamed her 'the barracuda'. And now our little barracuda has turned into a real kitten. She has such an angelic personality most of the time (although when angry, she can be a little tigress!). And we think she smells like cotton candy. She and her twin brother Zach are the best of friends and it's so hard to believe that a year has already gone by since their rather shaky beginning. Brit will have the AFP tests and abdominal ultrasounds every three months as recommended. We continue to have a positive outlook and hope for the best.
Julie
and Yaki
|
Disclaimer: All information on this site, except for that from the doctors and researchers, is given by volunteers and parents. The information given is non-professional advice only and is not meant to replace the medical expertise of your doctor. The creators of this web site do not censor or edit tips submitted and are not responsible for any errors or misinformation. Please consult your physician for more information on how best to treat your child.
this page last modified: Friday October 10, 2008